Michigan lawmaker Josh Schriver recently made waves with his controversial statement that gay marriage should be illegal again.
This remark has stirred intense reactions from Michigan Democrats and the LGBTQ+ community.
As a conservative member of the Michigan GOP, Schriver’s stance touches on the legal status of same-sex marriage, public opinion, and the broader political landscape. Let’s dive into the details.
What Did Michigan Lawmaker Josh Schriver Say About Gay Marriage?
In late November 2023, Rep. Josh Schriver from Oxford, Michigan, made a bold and controversial statement on social media.
He argued that gay marriage should be illegal again, a sentiment that immediately caught the attention of many, particularly in the wake of the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2015 that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
Schriver, a conservative Republican, voiced his opposition to the ruling and called for a reversal, an idea that has sparked intense backlash from both political opponents and LGBTQ+ advocates.
Schriver’s comments highlight the ongoing debate over same-sex marriage rights.
While Michigan law currently permits gay marriage, Schriver’s statement reveals the broader conservative resistance to the Supreme Court’s decision.
His stance is rooted in religious convictions, specifically citing Bible verses from the book of Matthew, which he interprets as defining marriage as between a man and a woman.
For more on his background and public profile, here’s a look at Josh Schriver’s net worth and career highlights.
The Legal Status of Gay Marriage in Michigan and the U.S.
Gay marriage became legal in Michigan—and across the U.S.—following the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.
The ruling found that the denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples violated the due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment.
This landmark decision granted same-sex couples the right to marry, recognizing marriage equality as a constitutional right.
In Michigan, same-sex marriage was already legal before this ruling, following a legal challenge that began in 2014.
However, the Obergefell decision solidified nationwide legal recognition.
Despite the ruling, Schriver’s comments highlight a faction of conservative lawmakers who still seek to reverse the decision, arguing that marriage should only be between a man and a woman.
Reactions to Schriver’s Call to Make Gay Marriage Illegal Again
Schriver’s controversial remark did not go unnoticed, especially among Michigan Democrats and LGBTQ+ advocates.
Dana Nessel, Michigan’s Attorney General, sharply criticized Schriver’s statement, responding to him directly on social media.
Nessel, who is openly gay and married to her wife, expressed her dismay, questioning how such a move would benefit the people of Michigan.
Rep. Jason Morgan, a gay Democrat from Ann Arbor, also condemned Schriver’s stance, sharing how the statement threatened his own marriage and the marriages of thousands of same-sex couples across the state.
Public reactions reflect a broader division in society.
While some conservative voters in Schriver’s district may support his position, the backlash from LGBTQ+ groups and pro-equality advocates signals that the country’s stance on gay marriage has shifted significantly since 2015.
The Role of Religion in Schriver’s Views on Gay Marriage
Schriver’s opposition to same-sex marriage is deeply rooted in his religious beliefs.
In his defense, he cited various Bible verses, including those from the book of Matthew, arguing that Jesus defined marriage as between a man and a woman.
This religious justification is common among many conservative politicians who view same-sex marriage as a challenge to traditional religious values.
Religious perspectives continue to shape the political landscape, especially in debates surrounding LGBTQ+ rights.
Schriver’s remarks reflect this tension between religious beliefs and the evolving legal and societal acceptance of same-sex marriage.
The Michigan GOP and Their Stance on Gay Marriage
Schriver’s comments align with the broader conservative agenda within the Michigan GOP.
The party has historically taken a stance against same-sex marriage, although this has started to shift over the years as public opinion has become more supportive of LGBTQ+ rights.
Schriver’s views, however, are in line with a faction of the GOP that remains resistant to change.
The Michigan GOP’s return to power in the state House in 2023 means that Schriver, alongside other like-minded lawmakers, may have the opportunity to push for more conservative policies.
However, the challenge remains: with the 2015 Obergefell ruling still in place, any attempt to reverse gay marriage legalization faces significant legal hurdles.
Will Schriver’s Statement Affect the Future of Same-Sex Marriage in Michigan?
While Schriver’s call to make gay marriage illegal again has certainly sparked controversy, the legal status of same-sex marriage is unlikely to change without major shifts at the federal level.
The U.S. Supreme Court holds the power to overturn past decisions, but with a conservative 6-3 majority on the court, a reversal of Obergefell v. Hodges is still a matter of significant debate.
For now, Schriver’s influence in Michigan’s state legislature will likely have limited impact on same-sex marriage laws.
However, the political discourse around gay marriage continues to evolve, with LGBTQ+ rights advocates closely monitoring any legislative moves in the coming years.
Public Opinion on Same-Sex Marriage and How It Affects Politicians Like Schriver
Over the past decade, public opinion on same-sex marriage has shifted dramatically in favor of legal recognition for LGBTQ+ couples.
Polls show that a majority of Americans now support gay marriage, and Michigan is no exception.
Despite this, conservative figures like Schriver continue to resist these changes, relying on religious arguments and conservative ideologies to justify their opposition.
Politicians like Schriver face a difficult balancing act: supporting traditional values while addressing the evolving views of their constituents.
In Michigan, this issue is particularly important, as the state’s electorate becomes increasingly diverse and progressive on social issues.
The Broader Implications of Schriver’s Comments on LGBTQ+ Rights
Schriver’s remarks have broader implications for the LGBTQ+ community in Michigan and beyond.
His statement suggests that, despite the legal progress made in recent years, there is still a strong contingent of conservative voices that seek to challenge the rights of same-sex couples.
As debates over LGBTQ+ rights continue, politicians like Schriver will likely remain central figures in the ongoing fight for equality.
For many in the LGBTQ+ community, Schriver’s comments are a stark reminder that the fight for marriage equality is far from over.
Advocates will need to continue pushing for protections and legislative action to safeguard the progress already made.
Conclusion
Schriver’s controversial comments on gay marriage reflect broader societal and political divides.
As Michigan and the U.S. continue to grapple with these issues, it’s important to stay informed and engaged.
Let us know your thoughts on Schriver’s remarks—share your views or read more about related topics on Ando Money.
